Reservations - Rethinking

Income must be the lone criteria for reservation: Misra panel
Special Correspondent

NEW DELHI: The National Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities has recommended the extension of quota to all religious minorities — including Hindus where they are in a minority — while advocating an overhaul of the reservation policy to make income the lone criteria for affirmative action.

In its report tabled in Parliament on Friday, the Commission said Scheduled Caste (SC) status should be delinked from religion to make the SC net fully religion-neutral like that of the Scheduled Tribes (STs).

For this, Para 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order 1950 — which originally restricted the SC net to Hindus and later opened it to Sikhs and Buddhists — should be wholly deleted by appropriate action.

Though it was not scheduled to be tabled on Friday, the report of the Commission headed by former Chief Justice of India Ranganath Misra was hurriedly presented to the House by Union Minister of State for Minority Affairs Salman Khursheed after the decision to adjourn the Lok Sabha sine die was taken in the morning following the first adjournment.

Calling for an overhaul of the entire reservation policy, the Commission, which submitted its report to the Government on May 10, 2007, has stressed the need to limit the benefits of reservation to the socially and economically backward.

Educational institutions


For this purpose, the Commission has suggested that the Below Poverty Line (BPL) lists prepared on the basis of social/educational and economic criteria should be used, as they are scientifically prepared and revised periodically.

“BPL lists should, therefore, be made eligible for grant of reservation without distinction on caste, class, group or religion basis.”

Working on the premise that socio-economic backwardness emanates from educational backwardness, the Commission has recommended that at least 15 per cent of the seats in all non-minority educational institutions should be earmarked by law for minorities.

Of the 15 per cent, the largest chunk of 10 per cent should go to Muslims — commensurate with their 73 per cent share of the total minority population in the country — and the remaining five per cent to other minorities.

While making this recommendation, the Commission has followed the judicial decisions mandating that only 50 per cent of the seats in a minority institution can be set aside for minorities in the interest of national integration. The 15 per cent reservation for minorities in non-minority institutions is justified by the Commission “by the same analogy and for the same purpose.”

In defining religious minorities, the Commission has gone beyond the scope of the definition used by the National Commission for Minorities.

According to the report, it should include all religious minorities — large or small — including the Hindus in the Union Territory of Lakshadweep and the States of Jammu & Kashmir, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Punjab.

The government has been dragging its feet on tabling this report and did so under pressure from parties such as the Samajwadi Party.

Speaking to The-Hindu earlier this year, Mr. Khursheed had said that the Congress differed with the Commission’s report.

I fully agree with the Ranganath Misra panel report that reservation should be delinked from caste, religion or any other criteria.

A person will feel the pangs of hunger no matter which caste or religion he belongs to.
Once we accept that a person is an Indian, it behoves us to see that he does not sleep hungry, has a roof over his head, has clothes to wear and has minimum education. These are basic needs which should be provided to all our citizens. We should also see that non citizens or infiltrators from neighbouring countries do not come inside our country and burden us for this dilutes the money we can spend on our own people.

We have also to see that we curtail the ever increasing demands of those who already are getting more than a hundred times these poor people. A case in point, the SBI officers are not satisfied with the 17.5% increase which all the other banks are getting. Why? What is so special about them?

The government stops pampering its employees by giving them 50% and above wage increases every 5 years by way of Wage Commission awards. This is beside the annual increments they get every year. This is beside the various allowances and perks they get.
After giving away all this money, the government has to busy itself by printing new notes to give to its employees so how will have anything to give to the BPL, EBPL, OBC,SC,ST etc etc.
I also note that the Congress differs on the report.
This is along expected lines.
They were the first party who started this vote bank politics game.
How can they give up?