Government modifies controversial section of IT Act

New Delhi, Nov.29 (ANI): The UPA Government on Thursday decided to modify the controversial section 66A of the Information Technology Act after the Supreme Court asked for Attorney General G.Vahanvati to present himself to explain what steps the government was taking to prevent its misuse.

The government decision came hours after the apex court accepted a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking amendment to the Information Technology Act in the wake of its alleged misuse in recent few cases.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir said that it was considering to take suo motu cognisance of recent incidents and wondered why nobody had so far challenged the particular provision of the IT Act.

Taking the case on urgent basis, the bench agreed to hear the PIL filed by a Delhi student Shreya Singhal later today.

However, the government has itself modified rules under Section 66(A).

As per reports, the government has issued an advisory to states on the procedure to be followed while implementing the Act. The new rules mandate a prior approval from the Deputy Commissioner of Inspector General of Police level before the Station House Officer (SHO) can register complaints under the section.

The government has taken the step in wake of growing incidents of alleged miscue of the Act. Two recent cases in Palghar near Mumbai highlighted the urgent need to relook at the Act. (ANI with inputs)

Who says public outcry has no affect.

However, I think, the letter sent by Justice Katju had the most effect.

But will he have the same effect on our own Mamta who too has been criticized by him. I doubt.

Even God does not know what Mamta will do next.

However, I don't know why the approval of only the Deputy Commissioner of Inspector General of Police is required.

Why is the permission not required from the level of the Magistrate as in all other cases of arrest warrants being issued.

Why only the DIG.

After all the police, whatever the level, are easily influenced by their political masters.