A French journalist on Hindu terrorism

Quite an inspiring and thought provoking piece, and that too from a foreign journalist

HINDU TERRORISM

Posted on January 22, 2013 by François Gautier

Is there such a thing as ‘Hindu terrorism’, as Home Minister Shinde is heavily hinting at?

Well, I am one of that rare breed of foreign correspondents — a lover of Hindus! A born Frenchman, Catholic-educated and non-Hindu, I do hope I’ll be given some credit for my opinions, which are not the product of my parents’ ideas, my education or my atavism, but garnered from 25 years of reporting in South Asia (for Le Journal de Geneve and Le Figaro).

In the early 1980s, when I started freelancing in south India, doing photo features on Kalaripayattu, the Ayyappa festival, or the Ayyanars, I slowly realised that the genius of this country lies in its Hindu ethos, in the true spirituality behind Hinduism.

The average Hindu you meet in a million villages possesses this simple, innate spirituality and accepts your diversity, whether you are Christian or Muslim, Jain or Arab, French or Chinese.

It is this Hinduness that makes the Indian Christian different from, say, a French Christian, or the Indian Muslim unlike a Saudi Muslim.

I also learnt that Hindus not only believed that the divine could manifest itself at different times, under different names, using different scriptures (not to mention the wonderful avatar concept, the perfect answer to 21st century religious strife) but that they had also given refuge to persecuted minorities from across the world—Syrian Christians, Parsis,Jews, Armenians, and today, Tibetans.

In 3,500 years of existence, Hindus have never militarily invaded another country, never tried to impose their religion on others by force or induced conversions.

You cannot find anybody less fundamentalist than a Hindu in the world and it saddens me when I see the Indian and western press equating terrorist groups like SIMI, which blow up innocent civilians, with ordinary, angry Hindus who burn churches without killing anybody.

We know also that most of these communal incidents often involve persons from the same groups—often Dalits and tribals—some of who have converted to Christianity and others not.

However reprehensible the destruction of Babri Masjid, no Muslim was killed in the process; compare this to the ‘vengeance’ bombings of 1993 in Bombay, which wiped out hundreds of innocents, mostly Hindus. Yet the Babri Masjid destruction is often described by journalists as the more horrible act of the two.

We also remember how Sharad Pawar, when he was chief minister of Maharashtra in 1993, lied about a bomb that was supposed to have gone off in a Muslim locality of Bombay.

I have never been politically correct, but have always written what I have discovered while reporting.

Let me then be straightforward about this so-called Hindu terror.

Hindus, since the first Arab invasions, have been at the receiving end of terrorism, whether it was by Timur, who killed 1,00,000 Hindus in a single day in 1399, or by the Portuguese Inquisition which crucified Brahmins in Goa.

Today, Hindus are still being targeted: there were one million Hindus in the Kashmir valley in 1900; only a few hundred remain, the rest having fled in terror.

Blasts after blasts have killed hundreds of innocent Hindus all over India in the last four years.

Hindus, the overwhelming majority community of this country, are being made fun of, are despised, are deprived of the most basic facilities for one of their most sacred pilgrimages in Amarnath while their government heavily sponsors the Haj.

They see their brothers and sisters converted to Christianity through inducements and financial traps, see a harmless 84-year-old swami and a sadhvi brutally murdered.

Their gods are blasphemed.

So sometimes, enough is enough.

At some point, after years or even centuries of submitting like sheep to slaughter, Hindus—whom the Mahatma once gently called cowards—erupt in uncontrolled fury. And it hurts badly. It happened in Gujarat. It happened in Jammu, then in Kandhamal, Mangalore, Malegaon, or Ajmer. It may happen again elsewhere.

What should be understood is that this is a spontaneous revolution on the ground, by ordinary Hindus, without any planning from the political leadership.

Therefore, the BJP, instead of fighting over each other as to whom should be the next party president, or who will be their PM candidate for the 2014 elections, should do well to put its house together. For it’s evident that the Congress has decided on this absurd strategy of the absurd, the untrue, the unjust, the treacherous, only to target Mr Narendra Modi, their enemy number One.

It should also fight the Untrue with Truth: there are about a billion Hindus, one in every six persons on this planet. They form one of the most successful, law-abiding and integrated communities in the world today.

Can you call them terrorists?

Let the BJP compile a statistics of how many Hindus were killed by Muslims since 1947 and how many Muslims by Hindus. These statistics will speak by themselves.

Francois Gautier

Quite an inspiring view.

We have only one party in India which was supposed to take care of the Hindus views.

However, of late it has become so much mired in CORRUPTION that people have become disillusioned with it.

It was the only party which allowed the Hindus to say "GARB SAY KAHO HUM HINDU HAI", "Say with Pride that I am a Hindu"

The Muslim can wear his skull cap whenever he wants and nobody to question him of being communal but if the wears his saffron rope, he is called communal.He wears his pagri very apologetically.

Why do we have to bend over backwards to prove our secular credentials.

All Muslim countries have driven out people of other religions and anybody saying anything against them is accused of blasphemy and sent to jail or given whipping.

It is only in India that the Muslim population which was 10% during partition in 1947 has now become 25%.

If the Muslims are so worried of their status in India, why are they multiplying by coming over the border.

In contrast, Kashmir, a state in India has decimated the Hindu population from over 10 lakhs in 1947 to hardly a hundred now. The BJP would have been the only party which could have helped the Hindus but their tendency to receive with open arms defectors from other parties like Congress, BSP, SP which are all turncoat parties has destroyed the BJP.Now there is no difference between the BJP and the others.

Their tendency to rake up the Ram Mandir during election time is self defeating. They have already milched that cow and its udders are now shrunk.

People are now more interested in bread and butter issues.

We are more interested in how clean a government you give us. How you root out corruption.

The Lokayukta controversy of Manohar Parrikar, the Goa Chief Minister has done more harm to the BJP than anything else.

Now, the only hope for the people of India is Arvind Kejriwal's AAP.